Category: Case Law
-
If the Board’s Email Goes to Your Spam …
A Respondent was being represented by an attorney in removal proceedings and was ordered removed. The attorneys for the Respondent filed a notice of appeal in a timely manner. On July 29, 2023, the Board issued a briefing schedule granting the Respondents until August 21, 2023, to file a brief. The briefing schedule was served…
-
THE BIA SAYS THAT A NOTICE GOING TO THE SPAM FOLDER DOES NOT EXCUSE FAILURE TO COMPLY
Matter of John ARCINIEGAS-PATINO, 28 I&N Dec. 883 (BIA 2025) Where parties were properly served with electronic notice of the briefing schedule, arepresentative’s failure to diligently monitor the inbox, including the spam folder, of theemail address of record does not excuse a party’s failure to comply with briefing deadlines. In the case Matter of John…
-
BIA’s Decision in Matter of Thakker
September 20, 2024, the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a decision in Matter of THAKKER, 28 I&N Dec. 843 (BIA 2024). Matter of Jurado, 24 I&N Dec. 29 (BIA 2006), aff’d sub. nom. Jurado-Delgado v. Att’y Gen. of U.S., 498 F. App’x 107 (3d Cir. 2009), overruled in part. In Matter of Thakker, the Board…
-
Department of State v. Muñoz
In State Department v. Muñoz, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against a U.S. citizen who said her constitutional rights were violated by the federal government when it denied a visa to her Salvadoran husband. Munoz and her husband, who she married in 2010 and has a child with, have been separated since 2015 while they…
-
SCOTUS Limits Ability To Reopen & Rescind In Absentia Removal Orders
The Supreme Court issued a decision limiting the ability of noncitizens to reopen and rescind in absentia orders of removal issued against them in their June 14, 2024 decision, Campos-Chaves v Garland, 602 U.S. ___ (2024). The relevant portions of the Court’s decision are quoted below. You can read the entire decision at the Supreme Court’s Website.…
-
Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Texas Immigration Law
Republican Gov. Greg Abbott signed the measure, Senate Bill 4, into law in December 2023, granting local law enforcement the power to arrest migrants and judges the ability to issue orders to remove them to Mexico. This was just after US Customs and Border Protection announced it would be temporarily suspending operations at the international…
-
An Incurable Notice to Appear
Matter of Aguilar Hernandez January 31, 2024, the Board issued a decision in Matter of Aguilar Hernandez, 28 I&N Dec. 774 (BIA 2024) finding: The Department of Homeland Security cannot remedy a notice to appear that lacks the date and time of the initial hearing before the Immigration Judge by filing a Form I-261 because…
-
Matter of H. N. Ferreira, 28 I&N Dec. 765 (BIA 2023)
Given the significance of a respondent’s interest in securing review of a denial of a petition to remove the conditions on permanent residence, an Immigration Judge should ordinarily review the denial of a Form I-751 upon the request of the respondent. [Full Decision] Matter of H. N. Ferreira, 28 I&N Dec. 765 (BIA 2023) At…
-
Respondent With A Pending Appeal of a Criminal Conviction Does Not Have a Criminal Conviction
The Board of Immigration Appeals published a decision holding that when a respondent has a pending appeal under section 460.30 of the New York Criminal Procedure Law the criminal conviction his not yet final and therefore the respondent has not been “convicted” as defined by INA §1101(a)(48)(A). Matter of Brathwaite Matter of Brathwaite, 28 I&N…
-
When Is A Government “Unable or Unwilling” To Protect Someone
When is a Government “unable or unwilling” to protect? The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), issued a precedential decision on asylum law, providing more guidance on how asylum applicants can meet the requirements of showing that a government is “unable or unwilling” to protect them from harm by private actors. Matter of C-G-T-, 28 I&N…
-
Important Update on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
On Sept. 13, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued a decision finding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Final Rule unlawful and expanding the original July 16, 2021 injunction and order of vacatur to cover the Final Rule. However, the court maintained a partial stay of the order for “all…
-
Federal Judge Rules DACA Not Legal But Keeps Protections Intact For Current DREAMers
Federal Judge rules DACA is illegal but says that the federal government does not have to take any action at this time.
Recent Posts
- If the Board’s Email Goes to Your Spam …
- HUNDREDS DEPORTED WITHOUT ANY DUE PROCESS IN VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER
- VICE PRESIDENT VANCE SAYS PERMANENT RESIDENTS CAN’T PERMANENTLY REMAIN IN THE US
- USCIS Published New Fee Schedule March 6, 2025
- Complaint Filed Against ICE Attorney Exposed as the Operator of Racist Twitter Account
Tags
2024 appeal asylum BIA Biden Bond Case Law CAT checklist citizenship court criminal DACA Detention EAD ECAS FAQ FOIA how to ICE inadmissibility interview marriage motions news NVC NYC Parole PIP Policy policy update Politics PSG SCOTUS SIJS Template TPS Trump update USCIS U visa Video Visa waiver webex
Comments
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.
This saved me from an RFE. Thnx.